✦ LIBER ✦

Numerical solution to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations on unbounded domains

✍ Scribed by Shenggao Zhou; Xiaoliang Cheng

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 451 KB
Volume: 80
Category: Article
ISSN: 0378-4754
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.019

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Numerical solution of coupled nonlinear

Numerical solution of coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation by Galerkin method

✍ M.S. Ismail 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 890 KB

Numerical study of nonlinear Schrödinger

Numerical study of nonlinear Schrödinger and coupled Schrödinger equations by differential transformation method

✍ A. Borhanifar; Reza Abazari 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 291 KB

Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear

Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations

✍ Scipio Cuccagna 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB 👁 1 views

Analytic Solutions to Nonelliptic Nonlin

Analytic Solutions to Nonelliptic Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations

✍ A. Debouard 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 495 KB

We prove local existence of analytic solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations. The class we consider includes a number of equations derived from the physical context of water waves. 1993 Academic Press, Inc.

Multiple existence of solutions for coup

Multiple existence of solutions for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations

✍ Norimichi Hirano; Naoki Shioji 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 346 KB

Erratum: Stabilization of solutions to n

Erratum: Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations

✍ Scipio Cuccagna 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 25 KB 👁 1 views

The proof of lemma 5.2 in [1] contains several mistakes. Nevertheless, the statement is correct and is proven in an elementary fashion, correctly this time, in [3, lemma 2.4], which is in this issue of the journal. In the proof of corollary 3.2 in [1], we misquoted from Kato's textbook on perturbat