Erratum: Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations
✍ Scribed by Scipio Cuccagna
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 25 KB
- Volume
- 58
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0010-3640
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The proof of lemma 5.2 in [1] contains several mistakes. Nevertheless, the statement is correct and is proven in an elementary fashion, correctly this time, in [3, lemma 2.4], which is in this issue of the journal.
In the proof of corollary 3.2 in [1], we misquoted from Kato's textbook on perturbation theory. In fact, it is not true that, as asserted in [1], corollary 3.2 follows from lemma 3.1. However, corollary 3.2 of [1] is a consequence of proposition 3.1 in [2] or, under more general hypotheses that allow eigenvalues embedded in the continuous spectrum and for space dimension 3, proposition 4.1 in [3].
Bibliography
[1] Cuccagna, S. Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We first construct traveling wave solutions for the Schrödinger map in ℝ^2^ of the form __m__(__x__~1~, __x__~2~ − ϵ __t__), where __m__ has exactly two vortices at approximately $\font\open=msbm10 at 10pt\def\R{\hbox{\open R}}(\pm {{1}\over{2 \epsilon}}, 0) \in \R^2$ of degree ±1. We