This discussion examines Robert Nozick's claim in Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York 1974) that his entitlement theory of justice avoids the paradox of collective choice shown by A. K. Sen in Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San 'pattern' to include the overall designs put forth by combinatio
β¦ LIBER β¦
Nozick on Sen: A reply to Perelli-Minetti
β Scribed by Miles Sonstegaard
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 243 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5833
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Nozick on Sen: A misunderstanding
β
C. R. Perelli-Minetti
π
Article
π
1977
π
Springer US
π
English
β 333 KB
Reply Reply to a comment on βoverlap rev
β
L. Salem; G. Berthier; J.-M. Lefour; T. Koga; J. Durup
π
Article
π
1990
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 191 KB
In reply to Senn, the authors show that the "dyavalent" concept of Salem et al. does have physical meaning. First, a wavefunction with a dyavalent component improves the energy of Hz. Second it is shown that dyavalence belongs to a family of symmetrybreaking situations where memory of the symmetric
On reincarnation: A reply to hales
β
Robert Almeder
π
Article
π
2001
π
Springer
π
English
β 635 KB
On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels
β
Pierre LeMorvan
π
Article
π
2010
π
Springer
π
English
β 137 KB
On von Kries: A reply to Brill
β
C. van Trigt
π
Article
π
2000
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 61 KB
Reply to a comment βon electron tunnelin
β
John R. Miller; Charles D. Jonah
π
Article
π
1975
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 298 KB