๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Notes on a function minimization approach to structural control

โœ Scribed by N. D. Ebrahimi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
293 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0098-8847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In this issue of this journal Warburton has presented a discussion' on a recent paper by the author., The original paper illustrated a technique for vibration control of continuous mechanical systems. Warburton's suggested method is an ingenious and intriguing concept. As he points out, his approach uses prescribed values of the location of the control forces. For this reason, this brief note provides some further comments on the subject when the problem is viewed as an unconstrained (two-parameter) mathematical programming problem (with locations of control fwces as known quantities).

Let us apply the vibration control strategy to the case of longitudinal vibration of a fixed-fixed elastic bar which is under the action of a harmonically varying force, such a s f = F sinwt. Figure 1 shows a schematic drawing of such a system. In this diagram, 1 is the length of the bar, p l ( 0 < p < 1) is the distance of the point of application of the load from the left end of the bar, x is the horizontal reference coordinate and u is the response of the system to the excitation (f). The steady-state response can be found by solving the partial X X


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A unified perspective on robot control:
โœ John T. Wen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 708 KB

A unified framework for the stability analysis of robot tracking control is presented. By using an energymotivated Lyapunov function candidate, the closed-loop stability is shown for a large family of control laws sharing a common structure of proportional and derivative feedback and a model-based f

A note on modified lattice approaches to
โœ Easton, Stephen A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 448 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This concept may be illustrated by considering two sequences: (a, = 1 -1/27 and (b, = 1 -1/ n). Both sequences converge to 1 but the sequence (a,) converges to 1 faster than the sequence (bJ. At the 0.05 precision level, the minimum convergence step for a, is 5, while the minimum convergence step f