✦ LIBER ✦

Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial

✍ Scribed by Djillali Annane; Philippe Vignon; Alain Renault; Pierre-Edouard Bollaert; Claire Charpentier; Claude Martin; Gilles Troché; Jean-Damien Ricard; Gérard Nitenberg; Laurent Papazian; Elie Azoulay; Eric Bellissant

Book ID: 117301715
Publisher: The Lancet
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 257 KB
Volume: 370
Category: Article
ISSN: 0140-6736
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61344-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for

Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial

✍ Andrea Morelli,Christian Ertmer,Sebastian Rehberg,Matthias Lange… 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.) 🌐 English ⚖ 405 KB

Comparison of norepinephrine and dobutam

Comparison of norepinephrine and dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and gastric tonometric variables in septic shock: a prospective, randomized study

✍ B. Levy; P.-E. Bollaert; C. Charpentier; L. Nace; G. Audibert; P. Bauer; P. Nabe 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB

Transfusion requirements in septic shock

Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

✍ Lars B Holst, Nicolai Haase, Jørn Wetterslev, Jan Wernerman, Anders Åneman… 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 351 KB

Efficacy of scorpion antivenom plus praz

Efficacy of scorpion antivenom plus prazosin versus prazosin alone for Mesobuthus tamulus scorpion sting envenomation in children: a randomised controlled trial

✍ Pandi, K.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Srinivasaraghavan, R.; Mahadevan, S. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 BMJ Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 552 KB

Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supp

Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

✍ David Cunningham; Seppo Pyrhönen; Roger D James; Cornelis JA Punt; Tamas F Hicki 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB

Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supp

Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

✍ David Cunningham; Seppo Pyrhönen; Roger D James; Cornelis JA Punt; Tamas F Hicki 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB

Background In phase II studies, irinotecan is active in metastatic colorectal cancer, but the overall benefit has not been assessed in a randomised clinical trial. Methods Patients with proven metastatic colorectal cancer, which had progressed within 6 months of treatment with fluorouracil, were ra