𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

New systemic frontline treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Ada H. Braun; Wolf Achterrath; Hansjochen Wilke; Udo Vanhoefer; Andreas Harstrick; Peter Preusser


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
166 KB
Volume
100
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Options for first‐line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma have broadened considerably with the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has demonstrated efficacy in Phase III trials and recently was approved for first‐line treatment in Europe and the United States. Capecitabine yielded similar median times to disease progression and median survival rates compared with bolus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU)/leucovorin (LV) (Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group regimen), with superior and similar response rates, respectively. However, its role as a first‐line, single‐agent substitute for intermittent infusional 5‐FU/LV remains to be defined. The addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5‐FU/LV resulted in improved response rates and progression‐free survival in large, randomized trials; moreover, irinotecan‐containing regimens resulted in improved overall survival. Prevalent regimens of irinotecan/5‐FU/LV and oxaliplatin/5‐FU/LV have been compared in two randomized Phase III trials. One study demonstrated the statistical superiority of oxaliplatin/infusional 5‐FU/LV over irinotecan/bolus 5‐FU/LV in terms of response, time to disease progression, and median survival; however, those advantages may have been attributable to infusional administration or to major differences in second‐line therapy. A randomized Phase III study comparing irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with the same infusional 5‐FU/LV regimens and crossover in case of disease progression showed equivalent efficacy for both schedules in the first‐line setting, but the irinotecan combination proved beneficial in terms of safety. New molecular targeted agents, such as angiogenesis‐modulating compounds (e.g., bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab), are under clinical investigation. This review updates current systemic frontline treatments and future perspectives for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Hepatic resection following systemic che
✍ Wyatt C. Fowler; Burton L. Eisenberg; John P. Hoffman 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 384 KB

Increasingly effective systemic chemotherapy has improved responses in patients with previously unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases. In the future, response to chemotherapy may define a new population of patients that may benefit from hepatic resection. A retrospective review to determine the

Systemic therapy for metastatic colorect
✍ Dan S. Zuckerman; Jeffrey W. Clark 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 204 KB

## Abstract A proliferation of new cytotoxic and biologic agents has led to improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The ability of surgery to increase long‐term survival in patients with liver and/or lung metastases also has been firmly established. It has become inc

Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment
✍ Kuniaki Shirao; Atsushi Ohtsu; Hideho Takada; Yasushi Mitachi; Kosei Hirakawa; N 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The goal of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and toxicity associated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S‐1 (a combination of tegafur, 5‐chloro‐2,4‐dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorect