Neutrality and betweenness in modular lattices
โ Scribed by Juhani Nieminen
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 213 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Two characterizations for neutral elements in modular lattices are given.
The purpose of this note is to characterize the neutrality in modular lattices by means of a betweenness relation. There are several betweenness relations in lattices and the following three can be found, e.g., in Padmanabhan's paper [6], where (a, z, b) always means that z is between a and b, and in addition B(a,z,b) means (ar\z)v(bAz)=z=(avz)A(bvz), C(a,z,b) means (aAz)v(bAz)=z=(aAb)vz, C*(a,z,b) means (avz)r(bvz)=z=(avb)Az. Padmanabhan proved that B(a, z, b) implies C(a, z, b) as well as C*(Q, z, b). Moreover the relations B, C and C* are equivalent in a lattice L if and only if L is modular [6, Theorem 41. Note that B(a, z, b) is equivalent to B(b, z, a); the same holds for the relations C and C*, too. An element n in a lattice L is neutral if and only if the equation (x A n)v o'An)V(XAY)=(
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Even lattices similar to their duals are discussed in connection with modular forms for Fricke groups. In particular, lattices of level 2 with large Hermite number are considered, and an analogy between the seven levels \(l\) such that \(1+l\) divides 24 is stressed. "t 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
We show that in the case of 2-dimensional lattices, Quebbemann's notion of modular and strongly modular lattices has a natural extension to the class group of a given discriminant, in terms of a certain set of translations. In particular, a 2-dimensional lattice has ``extra'' modularities essentiall