𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Class Groups and Modular Lattices

✍ Scribed by E.M Rains


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
125 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-314X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We show that in the case of 2-dimensional lattices, Quebbemann's notion of modular and strongly modular lattices has a natural extension to the class group of a given discriminant, in terms of a certain set of translations. In particular, a 2-dimensional lattice has ``extra'' modularities essentially when it has order 4 in the class group. This allows us to determine the conditions on D under which there exists a strongly modular 2-dimensional lattice of discriminant D, as well as how many such lattices there are. The technique also applies to the question of when a lattice can be similar to its even sublattice.

2001 Academic Press

An n-dimensional integral lattice 4 is modular [5] if there exists a similarity _ such that _(4*)=4, where 4* is the dual of 4. More generally, if 6 is a set of primes, define the 6-dual of 4 to consist of the vectors v # 4 Q such that v } 4/Z p for p # 6 and v } 4*/Z p for p Γ‚ 6. Then a similarity _ will be said to be a 6-modularity of 4 if _(4 V6 )=4; if _ multiplies norms by N, it will be said to be a modularity of level N. A lattice is strongly modular if it has 6-modularities for all subsets of the primes dividing its level. (This concept was introduced in [6], but we are using the notation of [8]).

In the present note, we consider the case n=2. It turns out that, properly defined, 6-duality acts as a translation on the class group. This allows us to answer the following question: Given a discriminant D and a set of primes 6, when does there exist a 2-dimensional lattice of that discriminant possessing a 6-modularity, and if one exists, how many are there? In particular, we answer this question for strongly modular lattices. The connection between class groups and modularities was alluded to in the case of square-free discriminant in [6], which also stated the appropriate special case of Corollary 10 below.

It will turn out to be convenient in the sequel to use nonstandard conventions when discussing quadratic forms. The basic difference is that the


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Groups with Almost Modular Subgroup Latt
✍ Francesco de Giovanni; Carmela Musella; Yaroslav P Sysak πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 175 KB
Classes of Ultrasimplicial Lattice-Order
✍ Daniele Mundici πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 71 KB

A lattice-ordered abelian group is called ultrasimplicial iff every finite set of positive elements belongs to the monoid generated by some finite set of positive Z-independent elements. This property originates from Elliott's classification of AF C U -algebras. Using fans and their desingularizatio

The Shadow Theory of Modular and Unimodu
✍ E.M Rains; N.J.A Sloane πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 452 KB

It is shown that an n-dimensional unimodular lattice has minimal norm at most 2[nΓ‚24]+2, unless n=23 when the bound must be increased by 1. This result was previously known only for even unimodular lattices. Quebbemann had extended the bound for even unimodular lattices to strongly N-modular even la

A Representation of Finitely-Modular AC-
✍ Jan Hamhalter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 231 KB

## Abstract We give a lattice‐theoretic characterization of the lattices of Mackey closed subspaces in a vector space __V__ (dim __V__ ≧ 4): These are exactly complete finitely‐modular AC‐lattices of the length at least four which have mutually perspective atoms.

The Strong Independence Theorem for Auto
✍ G. GrΓ€tzer; F. Wehrung πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 330 KB

97᎐108 proved a much stronger result, the strong independence of the automorphism group and the congruence lattice in the finite case. In this paper, we provide a full affirmative solution of the above problem. In fact, we prove much stronger results, verifying strong independence for general lattic