𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Nerve conduction sensitivity in diabetic neuropathy

✍ Scribed by J. Gert van Dijk; Michel D. Ferrari; Herman HPJ Lemkes


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
171 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


I read with interest the superb review/AAEM minimonograph number 26, ''The Electrodiagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome'' by Stevens. I was puzzled by his statement, ''It is not wise, however, to do multiple different sensitive NCSs in the same patient, because of the risk of a type I error (normal patient is mistakenly called abnormal) increases with each additional technique used.''

The same is true of the clinical evaluation. Does the author advocate the performance of a cursory history and physical examination because this would also decrease the probability of a type I error? The skilled clinician appreciates the difference between statistical and clinical significance. Just as it is not wise to make a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the basis of a few scattered fasciculations in the presence of an otherwise normal exam, so too the thoughtful electromyographer does not make a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome on the basis of a minimal isolated abnormality on serial, 1st digit, 4th digit, or palmar study in a patient whose clinical presentation is not strongly suggestive of carpal tunnel syndrome.

While it is not absolutely necessary to perform a wide battery of sensitive examinations in a patient with electrophysiologically obvious carpal tunnel syndrome, the more sensitive parameters become invaluable in the minority of patients whose symptomatology does not respond to surgery. In patients whose symptomatology does not respond, the comparison of multiple sensitive postoperative parameters with the preoperative values enables one to document with great certainty the quality of the electrophysiologic result. This is often not the case when only single motor and sensory determinations, are performed preoperatively. Since response to surgery cannot be predicted, and these examinations take only a few extra minutes for the experienced examiner to perform, I believe that the more sensitive examinations should be done in all patients undergoing surgery, regardless of how obvious their abnormalities are using conventional parameters.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Conduction velocity versus amplitude ana
✍ John R. Wilson; James D. Stittsworth Jr; Abdul Kadir; Morris A. Fisher πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 93 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Motor conduction velocities (CVs) were correlated with distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes for tibial, peroneal, and median nerves in patients with biopsy-proven chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), diabetic neuropathy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. On

F-wave latency, the most sensitive nerve
✍ Henning Andersen; Erik StΓ₯lberg; BjΓΆrn Falck πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 71 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

In this study we examined the diagnostic sensitivity of minimal F-wave latency, F-wave persistence, motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), and amplitude of the compound motor action potential (CMAP) of the median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal nerves, and of sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and senso

Conduction block in vasculitic neuropath
✍ Leo McCluskey; Shawn Bird πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 67 KB

We read with interest the recent short report titled "Conduction Block in Vasculitic Neuropathy" by Drs. Mohamed et al. (Muscle Nerve 1998;21:1084-1088). The chronic 2-year history and clinical findings of prominent ataxia, symmetric sensory loss, and weakness in their patient is more typical of an

The role of axonal ion conductances in d
✍ Stefan Quasthoff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 141 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Diabetic neuropathy is a common complication in diabetes mellitus. Diabetic neuropathy is accompanied by alterations in axonal excitability, which can lead to either ''positive'' (paresthesia, dysesthesia, pain) and/or ''negative'' (hypesthesia, anesthesia) symptoms. The mechanisms underlying these