๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Necessary Existence

โœ Scribed by Alexander R. Pruss and Joshua L. Rasmussen


Publisher
Oxford University Press, USA
Year
2018
Tongue
English
Leaves
232
Edition
Hardcover
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Necessary Existence breaks ground on one of the deepest questions anyone ever asks: why is there anything? The classic answer is in terms of a necessary foundation. Yet, why think that is the correct answer? Pruss and Rasmussen present an original defense of the hypothesis that there is a concrete necessary being capable of providing a foundation for the existence of things. They offer six main arguments, divided into six chapters. The first argument is an up-to-date presentation and assessment of a traditional causal-based argument from contingency. The next five arguments are new "possibility-based" arguments that make use of twentieth-century advances in modal logic. The arguments present possible pathways to an intriguing and far-reaching conclusion. The final chapter answers the most challenging objection to the existence of necessary things.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Necessary Existence
โœ Alexander R. Pruss, Joshua L. Rasmussen ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Necessary Existence breaks ground on one of the deepest questions anyone ever asks: why is there anything? Pruss and Rasmussen present an original defence of the hypothesis that there is a necessarily existing being capable of providing an ultimate foundation for the existence of all things.

Necessary existence
โœ Pruss, Alexander R.;Rasmussen, Joshua ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English
Necessary Existence
โœ Alexander R. Pruss, Joshua L. Rasmussen ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Necessary Existence</span><span> breaks ground on one of the deepest questions anyone ever asks: why is there anything? The classic answer is in terms of a necessary foundation. Yet, why think that is the correct answer? Pruss and Rasmussen present an original defense of the hypothesis that th