𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Nasopharyngeal swab and pcr for the screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the endemic area: A good supplement to the serologic screening

✍ Scribed by Tzung-Shiahn Sheen; Jenq-Yuh Ko; Yen-Liang Chang; Yuan-Shau Chang; Yu-Tzu Huang; Yao Chang; Ching-Hwa Tsai; Mow-Ming Hsu


Book ID
101245876
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
181 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common head and neck cancer in Taiwan. Early detection is the best way to improve survival for this disease.

A prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility of a new screening method for NPC by use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the close association of NPC and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

Methods. One hundred thirty-three different tissues from nasopharynx, nose, and sinus were investigated by use of PCR to check for the presence of EBV genome. Subsequently, from April 1996 to March 1997, 55 patients were enrolled in a prospective screening study. All patients underwent nasopharyngeal swabs before biopsy. Polymerase chain reaction detection of EBV genome was conducted on swab samples. Anti-EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) in IgA and IgG class were checked at the same visit.

Results. The EBV genome was present in 91.4% (85/93) of NPC tissues and in 25.0% (10/40) of non-NPC tissues (p < .001, 2 test). Of the 55 swabs, 49 (89.1%) specimens obtained enough cells for PCR examination. Thirty of these 49 patients were pathologically proved NPC. The presence of EBV were 86.7% (26/30) in NPC group and 42.1% (8/19) in non-NPC group. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 57.9%, respectively, which were similar to those of serologic method (87.5% and 43.5%) when the cut-off point was set at anti-VCA IgG ജ 160 and IgA ജ 10. Combining both methods elevates the specificity to 84.2%.

Conclusions. The sensitivity of this PCR screening method is similar to that of the serologic method. Combining both methods can greatly increase the specificity, indicating this new method is a good supplement to the serologic screening of this endemic disease.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES