𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Mutagenicity of dentin bonding agents

✍ Scribed by Schweikl, H. ;Schmalz, G. ;Bey, B.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
578 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Aside from the considerable number of reports on the physical and chemical properties of dental bonding agents, information concerning their biologic effects is sparse. Three dentin bonding agents (Prisma Universal Bond, Pertac Universal Bond, and Syntac) and the ingredients methylmethacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate, and glutaraldehyde were investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity test system using five different bacterial strains (TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA104). The materials as well as the ingredients were eluted in both dimethyl sulfoxide and physiologic saline, and serially diluted eluates were used in the plate incorporation test. Pertac Universal Bond and Prisma Universal Bond did not elicit any mutagenic effects in any of the bacterial strains. In contrast, Syntac adhesive showed clear mutagenicity in S. typkimurium strain TA102. Dimethyl sulfoxide eluates, as well as physiologic saline eluates of the Syntac bonding agent, caused numbers of revertants that were about 6 times higher than control values. Reversion rates with other strains were moderately enhanced. Glutaraldehyde, an ingredient of Syntac adhesives, caused mutagenicity in a manner similar to Syntac adhesive eluates. Neither 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate nor methylmethacrylate monomer was found to be mutagenic over a broad concentration range.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Glutaraldehyde-containing dentin bonding
✍ Schweikl, H. ;Schmalz, G. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 42 KB

The mutagenic potential of glutaraldehyde-con-materials. There was a moderate decrease of the number taining dentin bonding agents was shown in previous studies of surviving cells immediately after the end of exposure. using a bacterial gene mutation assay, the Ames test. How-Mutagenicity at the hpr

XPS studies of the bonding and hydrolysi
✍ R. L. Williams; S. A. M. Ali; D. F. Williams πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 289 KB

## Abstract X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been used to analyse the surface chemistry of dentine, the surface coverage of dentine by an experimental dentine bonding agent and the commercially available gluma Bond system and the hydrolysis of these adhesives. The cut dentine surface is shown t

Curing effectiveness of a light emitting
✍ Sun-Young Kim; In-Bog Lee; Byeong-Hoon Cho; Ho-Hyun Son; Chung-Moon Um πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 150 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This study tested the hypothesis that dentin bonding agents (DBAs) cured with a light emitting diode (LED) light curing unit (LCU) would not show a statistically significant different dentin shear bond strength (DSBS) relative to a halogen LCU, when the LED and halogen LCUs had a suppos

Comparative cytotoxicity of five current
✍ Hung-Wei Yeh; Mei-Chi Chang; Chun-Pin Lin; Wan-Yu Tseng; Hsiao-Hua Chang; Tong-M πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 288 KB

To compare the cytotoxicity of three nano-dentin bonding agents (nano-DBAs) and two non-nano-DBAs using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. We found that nano fillers were not the major contributing factor in DBA cytotoxicity, as analyzed by colony forming assay and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2