Group work is becoming the norm in organizations. From strategy planning committees to quality management teams, organizational members are collaborating on problem solving. One area of team support that is often desired is the scoring and ranking of decision alternatives on qualitative/subjective d
β¦ LIBER β¦
Mixed group ranks: preference and confidence in classifier combination
β Scribed by Melnik, O.; Vardi, Y.; Cun-Hui Zhang
- Book ID
- 117931135
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 809 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0162-8828
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Eliciting and mapping qualitative prefer
β
Ojelanki K Ngwenyama; Noel Bryson
π
Article
π
1999
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 276 KB
Combining ranking concept and social net
β
Shi-Jen Lin; Yi-Ying Jheng; Cheng-Hsien Yu
π
Article
π
2012
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 881 KB
Rank and grooming reciprocity among fema
β
Iris Leinfelder; Han de Vries; Rebekka Deleu; Mark Nelissen
π
Article
π
2001
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 95 KB
π 2 views
Combined permutation test and mixed-effe
β
SΓ©bastien MΓ©riaux; Alexis Roche; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Bertrand Thirion; J
π
Article
π
2006
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 244 KB
## Abstract In group average analyses, we generalize the classical oneβsample __t__ test to account for heterogeneous withinβsubject uncertainties associated with the estimated effects. Our test statistic is defined as the maximum likelihood ratio corresponding to a Gaussian mixedβeffect model. The
Evaluation of urinary CA19-9 levels in b
β
Keiji Nagao; Yukio Itoh; Kazuhiko Fujita; Makoto Fujime
π
Article
π
2007
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 218 KB
Specific food group combinations explain
β
KrΓΆger, J; Ferrari, P; Jenab, M; Bamia, C; Touvier, M; Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B; F
π
Article
π
2009
π
Nature Publishing Group
π
English
β 187 KB