This paper examines the relationship between forced migration and environmental change in West Africa, through an analysis of the changing institutional context through which resource use and management decisions are made. The paper draws on the work of Leach and Mearns (1991), who have highlighted
Migration, return and socio-economic change in West Africa: the role of family
โ Scribed by Richmond Tiemoko
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 117 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1544-8444
- DOI
- 10.1002/psp.320
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
This paper seeks to analyse the influence of migrants' families on return and the transfer of financial, human and social capital by West African migrants who have lived in Europe and North America. Based on a survey of over 600 โeliteโ and lessโskilled return migrants to Cรดte d'Ivoire and Ghana, as well as qualitative research with migrants remaining in London and Paris, the paper argues that families play an important role in return migration, remittances, and aspects of human, social and financial capital acquisition and investment. Using Cerase's typology of return migration, the analysis seeks to discriminate between migrants whose return decisions were affected by their families โ considered as โreturn of conservatismโ โ and those who made individual return decisions โ considered as โreturn of innovationโ. The findings reveal that the relationship between the type of return (and extent of family involvement in this decision), and the extent of financial, human and social capital transfers, varies between countries and across groups of migrants. Although those whose return is influenced by their families might be considered to have made more โconservativeโ return decisions, this group was found to be more likely to have transferred financial capital to their home country, and more likely to have maintained social capital gained abroad after their return. They were also as likely as โinnovativeโ returnees to have promoted changes in family life or in the workplace. The paper concludes by exploring several policy implications. Copyright ยฉ 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In his commentary, Richardson criticizes the analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and memory performance as presented by Herrmann and Guadagno (1997). Richardson's criticism addresses Herrmann and Guadagno's procedures for classifying economic backgrounds of subjects and t