Methods for the study of cytoplasmic effects on quantitative traits
β Scribed by J. A. Mosjidis; J. G. Waines; D. M. Yermanos; A. A. Rosielle
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 473 KB
- Volume
- 77
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5752
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The methods used to study cytoplasmic effects in quantitative traits often do not measure quantitative genetic parameters, while those that do are either complicated or do not take into account situations where the expression of cytoplasmic effects does not persist, but decreases in advanced generations. We present two simple models that take cytoplasmic effects and the quantitative genetic parameters into account. One of the models (A) is for cases where cytoplasmic effects remain constant through successive generations, and the second model (B) is for traits where cytoplasm-genotype interactions are present. This model also takes into account the decreasing persistence of cytoplasmic effects with advancing generations, which is often reported in the literature.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In genomewide genetic association studies, prior biological knowledge may help distinguish variation that is truly associated with a quantitative trait from the vast majority of unassociated variation that may be significant in hypothesis testing due to chance. However, formal methods f
The regressive models describe familial patterns of dependence of quantitative measures by specifying regression relationships among a person's phenotype and genotype and the phenotypes and genotypes of antecedents. When the number of sibs in the pattern of dependence increases, as in the class D re
The power to detect major gene effects by rejection of the "no major gene" null hypothesis against a mixed model alternative was determined in random samples of nuclear families over a variety of conditions. Benchmarks have been developed using a varying number of families whose structure includes b
The aim of this paper was to compare several methods of estimating the genetic components of a quantitative trait in familial data. The Expectation and Maximization (E-M) algorithm, the Newton-Raphson method, and the scoring method were compared for estimating polygenic and environmental effects on