Methodological issues in conjoint analysis: a case study
β Scribed by MacFie, Halliday J.H.; Jaeger, Sara R.; Hedderley, Duncan
- Book ID
- 115522011
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 425 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0309-0566
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
To help further our understanding of how keymethodological issues in conjoint analysis influence outcomes, a choiceβbased conjoint study measuring consumer preferences for preβpacked apple selection packs was conducted. The role of stimuli presentation format was considered by comparing the performance of physical prototype stimuli and realistic pictorial representations. This indicated no substantial differences in the choice decisions made using the two presentation formats and suggested that photographic images may be used instead of prototype stimuli. A second issue pertained to the need for training and warmβup exercises prior to the actual conjoint choice task. While this indicated some differences in choice strategies, a significant improvement in internal validity of choice decisions made with and without training was not achieved. One possible explanation for this finding may be that respondents made choices between apple products, a product category for which decision strategies are likely to be stable and wellβdeveloped.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Conjoint analysis is a technique relatively new to the evaluation of health care services in the UK. The technique uses data generated from questionnaires. This paper addresses the issue of response-ordering effects that may result from the ordering of dimensions of benefit within a question. Two qu
This paper adds to an increasing literature on methodological questions addressed in the application of conjoint analysis (CA) in health care. Three issues are addressed: ordering effects; internal validity; and internal consistency. The results of an application of CA in a primary care setting prov
We read with great interest the article by Azzalini et al., 1 who demonstrated that cigarette smoking worsens the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in obese Zucker rats. In a related letter, Xu and coworkers 2 showed that cigarette smoking may act as a cofactor but not as an indep