𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Methadone initiation and rotation in the outpatient setting for patients with cancer pain

✍ Scribed by Henrique A. Parsons; Maxine de la Cruz; Badi El Osta; Zhijun Li; Bianca Calderon; J. Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
209 KB
Volume
116
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Methadone is an effective and inexpensive opioid for cancer pain treatment. It has been reported as difficult to use in the outpatient setting because of its variable relative potency and long half‐life. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of methadone initiation or rotation for cancer pain treatment in outpatient settings.

METHODS:

Chart review was done of 189 consecutive patients who underwent methadone initiation or rotation at the authors' palliative care outpatient center. Data were collected regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, symptoms, and opioid side effects at baseline and for 2 follow‐up visits (F1, F2). Failure was defined as methadone discontinuation by the palliative care physician or patient's hospitalization for uncontrolled pain or methadone‐related side effects at F1.

RESULTS:

One hundred (53%) initiations and 89 (47%) rotations were conducted. Success rates for methadone initiation and rotation were 82 of 89 (92%) and 85 of 100 (84%), respectively. Mean (standard deviation) age was 60 (11) years. One hundred (53%) patients were women, 138 (73%) were white, and 182 (96%) had solid cancers. The main reason for rotation was pain (65 of 89 patients, 47%). Median (interquartile range, IQR) pain scores (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale/0‐10) were 6 (5‐8), 4 (3‐6), and 3 (2‐5) at baseline, F1, and F2, respectively (P < .0001). Median (IQR) daily methadone dose for initiation and rotation was 10 (5‐15) mg and 15 (10‐30) mg at F1 (P < .0001) and 10 (8‐15) mg and 18 (10‐30) mg at F2 (P < .0001), respectively. Constipation and nausea improved (P < .005) after initiation/rotation to methadone. Frequency of sedation, hallucinations, myoclonus, and delirium did not increase after initiation/rotation to methadone.

CONCLUSIONS:

Outpatient methadone initiation and rotation for cancer pain treatment were safe, with high success rates and low side effect profiles. Cancer 2010. Β© 2010 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Opioid rotation in patients with cancer
✍ Eduardo Bruera; Jose Pereira; Sharon Watanabe; Michelle Belzile; Norma Kuehn; Jo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 531 KB

## BACKGROUND. When a change of opioid is considered, equianalgesic dose tables are used. These tables generally propose a dose ratio of 5:l between morphine and hydromorphone. In the case of a change from subcutaneous hydromorphone to methadone, dose ratios ranging from 1:6 to 1:10 are proposed.

Dose ratio between morphine and methadon
✍ Peter G. Lawlor; Ken S. Turner; John Hanson; Eduardo D. Bruera πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 87 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: Current equianalgesic reference tables, based largely on single dose studies, give dose ratios of 1:1 to 4:1 for oral morphine to oral methadone, which possibly are inaccurate in patients with cancer pain who are exposed to multiple doses of these opioids. the purpose of this study w

Use of the subcutaneous route for the ad
✍ Eduardo Bruera; C. Brenneis; M. Michaud; R. Bacovsky; S. Chadwick; A. Emeno; N. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 454 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

From February 1985 until January 1987, 108 consecutive patients with pain due to advanced cancer requiring parenteral narcotics were treated with a subcutaneous infusion of morphine (62 patients) or hydromorphone (46 patients). Mean maximal daily dose of morphine and hydromorphone was 305 mg (range,

Anticoagulation for the initial treatmen
✍ Elie A. Akl; Sandeep Rohilla; Maddalena Barba; Francesca Sperati; Irene Terrenat πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 312 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The authors compared the relative efficacy and safety of low‐ molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between patients with and without cancer. ## METHODS. By using Cochrane methodology