𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer : A systematic review

✍ Scribed by Elie A. Akl; Sandeep Rohilla; Maddalena Barba; Francesca Sperati; Irene Terrenato; Paola Muti; Fadi Bdair; Holger J. Schünemann


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
312 KB
Volume
113
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

The authors compared the relative efficacy and safety of low‐ molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between patients with and without cancer.

METHODS.

By using Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews, separate meta‐analyses were conducted for subgroups of patients with and without cancer, and relative risks (RRs) were compared for statistical significance. The methodologic quality for each outcome was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS.

LMWH reduced mortality significantly compared with UFH in patients with cancer (RR of 0.71; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52‐0.98 [moderate‐quality evidence]) but not in patients without cancer (RR of 0.97; 95% CI, 0.65‐1.46 [low‐quality evidence]). However, the difference in the RR for the 2 subgroups did not reach statistical significance (P = .113). The difference between LMWH and UFH in the effect on recurrent VTE was not statistically significant in the subgroup with cancer (RR of 0.78; 95% CI, 0.29‐2.08 [low‐quality evidence]), in the subgroup without cancer (RR of 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60‐1.46 [low‐quality evidence]), or between the 2 subgroups (P = .367). No data were available for bleeding outcomes, thrombocytopenia, or postphlebitic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS.

The current results indicated that LMWH most likely is superior to UFH in reducing mortality in the initial treatment of VTE for patients with cancer. There is a need for more and better designed trials to confirm these findings. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The risk of venous thromboembolic diseas
✍ Steven R. Deitcher; Marcelo P. V. Gomes 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 110 KB 👁 1 views

## Background: Tamoxifen therapy for patients with breast carcinoma is perceived as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolic events (vte), but the risk associated with other adjuvant therapies is less well recognized. ## Methods: The authors conducted a computerized pubmed literature