A new bioactive bone cement (designated GBC), consisting of bioactive glass beads as an inorganic filler and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as an organic matrix, has been developed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of the amount of glass bead filler added to GBC on its mecha
Mechanical and biological properties of bioactive bone cement containing silica glass powder
β Scribed by Kobayashi, Masahiko ;Nakamura, Takashi ;Tamura, Jiro ;Iida, Hirokazu ;Fujita, Hiroshi ;Kokubo, Tadashi ;Kikutani, Takemi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 455 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9304
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Silica glass powder (SG-P) made by a fusing-packing the intramedullary canals of rat tibiae. An affinity quenching method was added as a second filler to a bioactive index was calculated for each cement; this was the length of bone cement consisting of MgO-CaO-SiO 2 -P 2 O 5 -CaF 2 apa-bone directly apposed to cement expressed as a percentage tite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic powder (AW-of the total length of the cement surface. Histological exami-P) and bisphenol-a-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA)-based nation of implanted tibiae for up to 26 weeks showed that resin, to achieve a higher mechanical strength and better the affinity indices decreased with SG-P content and that handling properties in use. Five types of cement were used, those of all the cement groups increased with time. At 26 containing different weight ratios of AW-P/SG-P (Group weeks, Groups 1 and 2 had almost identical affnity indices 1 Ο 100/0; Group 2 Ο 75/25; Group 3 Ο 50/50; Group (79% and 75%; no significant difference) but those of the 4 Ο 25/75; and Group 5 Ο 0/100) as filler, to evaluate the other groups remained at Ο½50%. Group 2 had better mechanieffect of SG-P content on the biological, mechanical, and cal and handling properties than Group 1, and an SG-P conhandling properties. The total proportion of filler added to tent in the filler of no more than 25% w/w did not interfere the cements was 85% w/w. The compressive, bending, and strongly with the bioactivity of the cement. Β© John Wiley & tensile strengths and fracture toughness of the cements in-
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of surface treatment on the mechanical properties of strontiumβcontaining hydroxyapatite (SrβHA) bioactive bone cement. Previously we developed an injectable bioactive cement (SrHAC) system composed of SrβHA powders and bisphen
In methylmethacrylate (MMA)-based cements containing bioactive particles, polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) is known to suppress the bioactivity of Bioglass and apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic (AW-GC). Little is known about the effect of different silane treatment methods on the bioactivity of AW-GC.
We took three types of bioactive bone cement (designated AWC, HAC, and TCPC), each with a different bioactive filler, and evaluated the influence of each filler on the mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of the cement. The cements consisted of bisphenol-a-glycidyl methacrylate-based (Bis-GMA
We examined the influence of the proportion of glass-ceramic powder in a bioactive bone cement of our formula on the bone-bonding ability of cement. Changes in cement bonding with time also were examined. The bioactive bone cement consisted of MgO-CaO-SiO 2 -P 2 O 5 -CaF 2 glass-ceramic powder (AW-G