A new bioactive bone cement: Effect of glass bead filler content on mechanical and biological properties

✍ Scribed by Shinzato, Shuichi ;Nakamura, Takashi ;Kokubo, Tadashi ;Kitamura, Yoshiro

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2000
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 928 KB
• Volume: 54
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0021-9304
• DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20010315)54:4<491::aid-jbm40>3.0.co;2-o

✦ Synopsis

A new bioactive bone cement (designated GBC), consisting of bioactive glass beads as an inorganic filler and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as an organic matrix, has been developed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of the amount of glass bead filler added to GBC on its mechanical and biological properties, and to decide the most suitable content of filler. Serial changes in GBC with time were also examined. The newly designed bioactive beads, consisting of MgO-CaO-SiO 2 -P 2 O 5 -CaF 2 glass, were added to the cement in the proportions 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 wt %. These cements were designated GBC30, GBC40, GBC50, GBC60, and GBC70, respectively. The compressive strength and the elastic modulus of bending of GBC increased as the glass bead content increased. The various types of GBC were packed into the intramedullar canals of rat tibiae to evaluate osteoconductivity, as determined by an affinity index calculated as the length of bone in direct contact with the cement expressed as a percentage of the total length of the cement surface. Rats were killed at 4 and 8 weeks after the operation and the affinity index was calculated for each type of GBC. Histologically, new bone had formed along the surface of all types of GBC within 4 weeks, even in GBC30 containing only 30 wt % of glass beads. At each time interval studied, there was a trend for the affinity index of GBC to increase as the glass bead filler content increased. There was no significant increase of affinity index between GBC60 and GBC70. The affinity indices for all types of GBC increased significantly with time up to 8 weeks. The handling properties of GBC were comparable to those of conventional PMMA bone cement. We conclude that when mechanical properties and osteoconductivity are both taken into consideration, GBC60 is the most suitable formulation; it shows excellent osteoconductivity and sufficient mechanical strength for clinical use.