๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Measuring the rate of progression in Friedreich ataxia: Implications for clinical trial design

โœ Scribed by Lisa S. Friedman; Jennifer M. Farmer; Susan Perlman; George Wilmot; Christopher M. Gomez; Khalaf O. Bushara; Katherine D. Mathews; S. H. Subramony; Tetsuo Ashizawa; Laura J. Balcer; Robert B. Wilson; David R. Lynch


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
85 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-3185

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Friedreich ataxia is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by ataxia of all four limbs, dysarthria, and arreflexia. A variety of measures are currently used to quantify disease progression, including the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale, examinerโ€rated functional disability scales, selfโ€reported activities of daily living and performance measures such as the timed 25โ€foot walk, 9โ€hole pegboard test, PATA speech test, and lowโ€contrast letter acuity vision charts. This study examines the rate of disease progression over one and two years in a cohort of 236 Friedreich ataxia patients using these scales and performance measure composites. The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale and performanceโ€measure composites captured disease progression, with a greater sensitivity to change over 2 years than over 1 year. The measures differed in their sensitivity to change and in possible bias. These results help to establish norms for progression in FRDA that can be useful in measuring the longโ€term success of therapeutic agents and defining sampleโ€size calculations for doubleโ€blind clinical trials. ยฉ 2010 Movement Disorder Society


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the appropriateness of marginal model
โœ J. K. Lindsey; P. Lambert ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 291 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Although models developed directly to describe marginal distributions have become widespread in the analysis of repeated measurements, some of their disadvantages are not well enough known. These include producing profile curves that correspond to no possible individual, possibly showing that a trea

Time for changes in the design, analysis
โœ David T. Felson; Jennifer J. Anderson; Robert F. Meenan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 910 KB

The randomized, controlled clinical trial has become the standard approach to evaluating the efficacy of slow-acting drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Such trials, which were used as far back as the 1940s to evaluate antimalarial agents and gold and as recently as 1988 to evaluate

Outcome assessment in clinical trials ev
โœ Robert F. Meenan; Jennifer J. Anderson; Lewis E. Kazis; Marlene J. Egger; Mary A ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 828 KB

Health status measures are conceptually relevant to the assessment of clinical outcome in the rheumatic diseases, but their ability to detect meaningful changes in health has not been clearly demonstrated. This report describes the performance of a self-administered health status questionnaire in a

The implications of variation in outcome
โœ Chris Roberts ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 100 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Methodological work on randomized trials has largely concerned pharmacological interventions in which the e!ects of the attending health professional may be regarded as minor. In other clinical settings, such as surgery, talk or physical therapies, sta! speci"c variation may make generalization prob