Although models developed directly to describe marginal distributions have become widespread in the analysis of repeated measurements, some of their disadvantages are not well enough known. These include producing profile curves that correspond to no possible individual, possibly showing that a trea
Measuring the rate of progression in Friedreich ataxia: Implications for clinical trial design
โ Scribed by Lisa S. Friedman; Jennifer M. Farmer; Susan Perlman; George Wilmot; Christopher M. Gomez; Khalaf O. Bushara; Katherine D. Mathews; S. H. Subramony; Tetsuo Ashizawa; Laura J. Balcer; Robert B. Wilson; David R. Lynch
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 85 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
Friedreich ataxia is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by ataxia of all four limbs, dysarthria, and arreflexia. A variety of measures are currently used to quantify disease progression, including the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale, examinerโrated functional disability scales, selfโreported activities of daily living and performance measures such as the timed 25โfoot walk, 9โhole pegboard test, PATA speech test, and lowโcontrast letter acuity vision charts. This study examines the rate of disease progression over one and two years in a cohort of 236 Friedreich ataxia patients using these scales and performance measure composites. The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale and performanceโmeasure composites captured disease progression, with a greater sensitivity to change over 2 years than over 1 year. The measures differed in their sensitivity to change and in possible bias. These results help to establish norms for progression in FRDA that can be useful in measuring the longโterm success of therapeutic agents and defining sampleโsize calculations for doubleโblind clinical trials. ยฉ 2010 Movement Disorder Society
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The randomized, controlled clinical trial has become the standard approach to evaluating the efficacy of slow-acting drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Such trials, which were used as far back as the 1940s to evaluate antimalarial agents and gold and as recently as 1988 to evaluate
Health status measures are conceptually relevant to the assessment of clinical outcome in the rheumatic diseases, but their ability to detect meaningful changes in health has not been clearly demonstrated. This report describes the performance of a self-administered health status questionnaire in a
Methodological work on randomized trials has largely concerned pharmacological interventions in which the e!ects of the attending health professional may be regarded as minor. In other clinical settings, such as surgery, talk or physical therapies, sta! speci"c variation may make generalization prob