๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Maximizing models of legislative choice

โœ Scribed by Ronald S. Warren


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
349 KB
Volume
42
Category
Article
ISSN
0048-5829

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A number of recent studies have reported estimates of single equation and simultaneous equations models of the decisions of state legislatures. These investigations have been 'economic' ones, in the sense that considerations of the relative costs and benefits to some self-interested person or group capable of affecting legislative outcomes have motivated the choice of explanatory variables. Thus, perhaps implicitly, these studies have assumed utility maximization by some critical agent(s) in the political marketplace. This essay draws attention to the implications of this maximizing assumption for the proper specification and estimation of the associated empirical models.

* Financial support from a Faculty Fellowship for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Virginia is gratefully acknowledged. Peter H. Aranson, William R. Johnson, and three anonymous referees provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Responsibility for remaining errors is mine.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Choice of rheological models
โœ A. Kh. Mirzadzhanzade; Z. P. Shul'man; M. G. Kopeikis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1974 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 130 KB
A profit-maximizing supply chain network
โœ Zuo-Jun Max Shen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 198 KB

We present a profit-maximizing supply chain design model in which a company has flexibility in determining which customers to serve. The company may lose a customer to competition if the price it charges is too high. We show the problem formulation and solution algorithm, and discuss computational r

Models of health plan choice
โœ Charles Abramson; Thomas Buchmueller; Imran Currim ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 184 KB

This paper considers alternative approaches to accounting for consumer heterogeneity in econometric models of health plan choice. In particular, we compare and contrast approaches used by health economists and marketing researchers to explicitly allow for consumer heterogeneity in assessment of plan