✦ LIBER ✦

Maternal cell contamination of amniotic fluid cell cultures: Results of a U.S. nationwide survey

✍ Scribed by Benn, Peter A. ;Hsu, Lillian Y. F. ;Karp, Laurence E.

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1983
Tongue: English
Weight: 631 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 0148-7299
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320150213

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A high incidence of maternal cell contam

A high incidence of maternal cell contamination of amniotic fluid cell cultures

✍ Benn, Peter A. ;Schonhaut, Amy G. ;Hsu, Lillian Y. F. ;Karp, Laurence E. 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 322 KB 👁 2 views

Maternal cell contamination in amniotic

Maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples as a consequence of the sampling technique

✍ Silke Nuß; Dagmar Brebaum; Caspar Grond-Ginsbach 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 423 KB

Maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples is easily detected by in situ hybridization if the karyotype of the fetus differs from the karyotype of the mother. One out of two amniotic fluid samples appears to contain more than 20% maternal cells. Bloody samples often contain even more than

A technique forin situKaryotyping of pri

A technique forin situKaryotyping of primary amniotic fluid cell cultures

✍ W. Schmid 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 334 KB

A time proven technique is described for growing amniotic fluid cell cultures on cover glasses in Leighton tubes and for processing the mitotic cells in situ. Karyotyping the clones in situ eliminates most of the problems caused by somatic chromosome mutations in vitro and by maternal cell growth.

Overwhelming maternal cell contamination

Overwhelming maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples from patients with oligohydramnios can lead to false prenatal interphase FISH results

✍ L. L. Estabrooks; J. Sanford Hanna; A. N. Lamb 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB 👁 2 views

reason that a cytogenetic study was performed in the present case. The finding of an, apparently, non-mosaic 90,XX karyotype was surprising, given its rarity. This chromosomal constitution had to be the product of two errors: one prezygotic originating a 45,X zygote and then an endoreduplication of