𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Thomas D. Denberg; Brenda L. Beaty; Fernando J. Kim; John F. Steiner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
87 KB
Volume
103
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary treatment for early‐stage prostate carcinoma includes expectant management or, for curative intent, radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Treatment recommendations are generally guided by clinical factors such as Gleason grade, prostate‐specific antigen level, comorbid illnesses, and patient age. Sociocultural factors may also have influences on patient and urologist treatment choices.

METHODS

The authors used bivariate and multinomial logistic regression to identify medical and sociodemographic predictors of prostatectomy (compared with radiotherapy) and curative therapy (compared with expectant management) in a cohort of 27,920 non‐Latino white, black, and Latino men without comorbidities in the latest linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results–Medicare dataset (years 1995–1999). Predictors included tumor stage, patient age, marital status, race/ethnicity, and soscioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Younger age and higher tumor grade were robust predictors of curative treatment compared with expectant management and of prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy. Sociodemographic factors had an additive role in treatment choice. Marriage predicted curative treatment compared with expectant management (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 1.28 [1.25–1.30]) and prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy (adjusted RR = 1.24 [1.20–1.28]). Although blacks and Latinos were just as likely as whites to receive curative treatment, blacks were significantly less likely, whereas Latinos were more likely, to receive prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy (adjusted RRs = 0.77 [0.72–83]) and 1.24 [1.18–1.30], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Marriage was positively associated with curative treatment in general, and with prostatectomy specifically. Blacks received prostatectomy less often than whites, although they did not receive less curative treatment overall. Latinos received prostatectomy more often than whites. Clinicians should recognize the importance of cultural and social forces as well as biomedical factors in decisions regarding the treatment of patients with early‐stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2005. Β© 2005 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Defining sexual outcomes after treatment
✍ Leslie R. Schover; Rachel T. Fouladi; Carla L. Warneke; Leah Neese; Eric A. Klei πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 129 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The objective of this survey was to identify factors associated with good sexual outcomes in a large group of survivors of localized prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS A postal survey was sent to 2636 men in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation's Prostate Cancer Registry who eit

Is there age bias in the treatment of lo
✍ Shabbir M. H. Alibhai; Murray D. Krahn; Marsha M. Cohen; Neil E. Fleshner; Georg πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 195 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowl