Is there age bias in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma?
β Scribed by Shabbir M. H. Alibhai; Murray D. Krahn; Marsha M. Cohen; Neil E. Fleshner; George A. Tomlinson; Gary Naglie
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 195 KB
- Volume
- 100
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowledge not RLE, on actual treatment decisions.
METHODS
An ageβstratified random sample of 347 patients was generated from a cohort of all patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma in the Ontario Cancer Registry between May 1, 1995 and April 30, 1996 (n = 5192). Chart review was performed to obtain detailed tumor, comorbidity, and treatment information. RLE was estimated from a published model derived from a cohort of 451 men with untreated prostate carcinoma who were followed for 15 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of treatment, such as radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), or potentially curative therapy (RP or RT), in relation to patient age, comorbidity, tumor characteristics, and RLE.
RESULTS
RP was provided within 6 months of diagnosis to 58.7%, 32.1%, 2.6%, and 0% of patients of ages < 60 years, 60β69 years, 70β79 years, and 80+ years, respectively. The results for RT were 6.4%, 30.9%, 23.4%, and 3.3%, respectively. Increasing comorbidity decreased rates of RP but did not affect use of RT. After controlling for comorbidity and tumor characteristics, older men were found to be treated with RP less often than younger men with similar RLE, whereas RLE did not appear to influence receipt of RT.
CONCLUSIONS
Although different mechanisms may account for these results, an age bias may be present among urologists and radiation oncologists treating men with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:72β81. Β© 2003 American Cancer Society.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Definitive treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate has included radical surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and interstitial radiation therapy. The interstitial agent most commonly used is Iodineβ125. Fortyβeight patients were treated with interstitial radiation therapy u
## Background: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as t1 or t2. ## Methods: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (t1, 23%; t2, 77%) were treated with iodi