𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Is there age bias in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma?

✍ Scribed by Shabbir M. H. Alibhai; Murray D. Krahn; Marsha M. Cohen; Neil E. Fleshner; George A. Tomlinson; Gary Naglie


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
195 KB
Volume
100
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowledge not RLE, on actual treatment decisions.

METHODS

An age‐stratified random sample of 347 patients was generated from a cohort of all patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma in the Ontario Cancer Registry between May 1, 1995 and April 30, 1996 (n = 5192). Chart review was performed to obtain detailed tumor, comorbidity, and treatment information. RLE was estimated from a published model derived from a cohort of 451 men with untreated prostate carcinoma who were followed for 15 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of treatment, such as radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), or potentially curative therapy (RP or RT), in relation to patient age, comorbidity, tumor characteristics, and RLE.

RESULTS

RP was provided within 6 months of diagnosis to 58.7%, 32.1%, 2.6%, and 0% of patients of ages < 60 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and 80+ years, respectively. The results for RT were 6.4%, 30.9%, 23.4%, and 3.3%, respectively. Increasing comorbidity decreased rates of RP but did not affect use of RT. After controlling for comorbidity and tumor characteristics, older men were found to be treated with RP less often than younger men with similar RLE, whereas RLE did not appear to influence receipt of RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although different mechanisms may account for these results, an age bias may be present among urologists and radiation oncologists treating men with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:72–81. Β© 2003 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Analysis of iodine-125 interstitial ther
✍ Dr. Leonard G. Comella; Seth M. Steinberg; Mark F. Ellison; Woodrow W. Reeves; R πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 609 KB

## Abstract Definitive treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate has included radical surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and interstitial radiation therapy. The interstitial agent most commonly used is Iodine‐125. Forty‐eight patients were treated with interstitial radiation therapy u

Interstitial iodine-125 radiation withou
✍ Haakon Ragde; John C. Blasko; Peter D. Grimm; Gerald M. Kenny; John E. Sylvester πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 156 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as t1 or t2. ## Methods: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (t1, 23%; t2, 77%) were treated with iodi