Analysis of iodine-125 interstitial therapy in the treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate
β Scribed by Dr. Leonard G. Comella; Seth M. Steinberg; Mark F. Ellison; Woodrow W. Reeves; Robert C. Flanigan; J. William McRoberts
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 609 KB
- Volume
- 46
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Definitive treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate has included radical surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and interstitial radiation therapy. The interstitial agent most commonly used is Iodineβ125. Fortyβeight patients were treated with interstitial radiation therapy using Iodineβ125 implants with a median followβup of 55 months. Fortyβthree percent of the evaluable patients had progressive disease with approximately 50% progressing at 5 years by KaplanβMeier analysis. Overall actuarial survival in the group was 80% at 5 years. This and several other studies suggest that control of prostate cancer with Iodineβ125 seeds may be suboptimal as compared with other treatment modalities, especially the radical retropubic prostatectomy. Analysis of treatment parameters is presented along with a discussion of the current status and future prospects for treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate with interstitial radiation therapy.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as t1 or t2. ## Methods: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (t1, 23%; t2, 77%) were treated with iodi
In a prospective study, 14 patients with primary non-oat cell lung carcinoma were treated with intraoperative Iodine'25 (I'25) implantation of the lung tumor via lateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy . Staging mediastinal node dissection was performed in each case. Patients were selected when wed
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowl