Marker segregation information in breast/ovarian cancer genetic counseling: Is it still useful?
✍ Scribed by Essioux, Laurent; Girodet, Catherine; Sinilnikova, Olga; Pag�s, Sabine; Eisinger, Fran�ois; R�sende, Sandrina de; Maugard, Christine; Lano�, Didier; Longy, Michel; Bignon, Yves-Jean; Sobol, Hagay; Bona�ti-Pelli�, Catherine; Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 58 KB
- Volume
- 79
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0148-7299
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980923)79:3<175::aid-ajmg5>3.0.co;2-m
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The use of mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a genetic test is still to a certain extent limited and the oncogeneticist may want to use complementary approaches to identify at-risk individuals. In a series of 23 families with at least three breast or ovarian cancer cases, screened for mutations at BRCA1 and BRCA2 and typed for markers at both loci, we investigated the usefulness of marker segregation information at two levels: 1) to what extent can the indirect approach identify the mutation carrier status of screened cases and their first-degree relatives, and 2) in what way does it help to identify the gene implicated in a family in which neither BRCA1 nor BRCA2 mutation has been detected? Using the indirect approach, the carrier status of the screened case could be determined with quasi certainty in three families and with a high probability in eight families. This status could be inferred in unaffected first-degree relatives as almost certain in one family and as highly probable in six families. Fourteen mutations were found concurrently in our series. Among the nine mutation-negative families, we were able to conclude that a BRCA1 mutation most probably segregated in one and that a mutation other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 was probably involved in two families. Our results show that, in small families, little help is to be expected from linkage data and mutation screening is the only way of identifying the origin of a genetic predisposition in a family. Marker segregation information may be useful in some large breast/ovarian cancer families in which no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has been detected.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is not clear if hereditary site-specific ovarian cancer exists as a genetic entity distinct from the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. We have identified a large Ashkenazi Jewish kindred with 8 cases of ovarian carcinoma and no cases of breast cancer. Initially, linkage analysis for this
Women with a family history of breast cancer often over-estimate their personal risk for cancer and may view themselves as candidates for genetic testing even when the likelihood of an informative test result is low. We report here on genetic counseling of women with an intermediate family history o
The identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2, two breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, has brought many ethical and social issues to the forefront. This paper presents the results of a survey assessing the attitudes of 238 unaffected first-degree relatives of women with breast or ovarian cancer rega
Recently we published a review about genetic counseling and the provision of risk information in Angelman syndrome (AS) ]. However, since then, new evidence indicates that gonadal mosaicism may affect recurrence risk in the subset of AS patients who are affected as the result of UBE3A gene mutations