Michael Salinger has provided a very thoughtful and well-balanced article on margin requirements. The article builds upon and extends some of my earlier work on margin requirements and stock market volatility. Professor Salinger, however, reaches a different conclusion than I did about the influence
Margin requirements and stock volatility
β Scribed by G. William Schwert
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 667 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0920-8550
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Since 1934 the Federal Reserve Board has had the power to set separate limits on the amount of credit that can be extended to purchasers of common stock. There has been much recent debate about the efficacy of these margin regulations. This article argues that the Fed has responded to increases in stock prices by raising margin requirements. The increase in prices has been associated with a decrease in volatility. There is no evidence that changes in margin requirements reduce subsequent stock return volatility. Also, trading halts have not had much effect on volatility in the past. Trading halts that were associated with banking panics were associated with high stock return volatility, but halts without bank panics were not associated with high levels of volatility.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article investigates the relationship between initial margin requirements and stock return volatility. Volatility is measured using a GARCH in Mean model. We find no evidence of an empirical relationship between margin requirements and the volatility of the S&P 500 index portfolio's excess retu
This article reexamines the evidence on the relationship between stock market margin buying and volatility, and discusses the implications for the regulation of futures markets margin requirements. Post-war data provide no evidence of a link between the initial margin requirements set by the Federal
rokers and exchanges require customers to provide security deposits called B margins when they trade in futures markets. Minimum margin levels are set by exchanges and brokers must set margin requirements for their customers at least equal to these minimums. This system has come under attack as fina
CCC 0270-731 41931060677-15 'Stoll and Whaley's (1987) findings are consistent with those reported by Edwards. 'Blume, MacKinlay, and Terker (1989) document the existence of short-term price reversals in S&P 500 stocks during the October 1987 market break. They find these price reversals are related
## Abstract Unlike the traditional futures contract riskβbased approach to margining, new security futures contracts are margined under a strategyβbased margining system similar to that which applies in the equity options markets. As a result, these new margin requirements are potentially much less