𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Malignant hepatic tumor detection with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging with a 1.5-T system: Comparison of four imaging pulse sequences

✍ Scribed by Masayuki Kanematsu; Kyo Itoh; Masayuki Matsuo; Yoji Maetani; Fumie Ametani; Hiroshi Kondo; Hiroki Kato; Hiroaki Hoshi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
387 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Solitary hepatic metastasis: Comparison
✍ Richard C. Semelka; J. Patrick Shoenut; Susan M. Ascher; Mervyn A. Kroeker; Howa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 649 KB

## Abstract Twenty consecutive cancer patients with a solitary hepatic metastasis detected with dynamic contrast‐materialβ€”enhanced computed tomography (CT) who were considered for hepatic resection underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging within 18 days after CT. Histologic confirmation was obtain

Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic M
✍ Kosuke Morita; Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuo Awai; Masanori Komi; Masahiro Hashida; T πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 495 KB

## Abstract To identify the optimum sequence at gadoxetic acid enhanced hepatic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the arterial phase, we studied phantoms that contained gadoxetic acid or gadopentetate dimeglumine diluted in human blood. We obtained magnetic resonance images at 3.0 T and 1.5 T w

Comparison of lymph node metastases asse
✍ Seung Hong Choi; Keon Ha Kim; Woo Kyung Moon; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Jin Ho πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 361 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic performances of 1.5 T and 3.0 T ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in a rabbit model. ## Materials and Methods: Experiments were

Erratum to: Morita, et al., Enhancement
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 225 KB

The Fig. 3 was incorrect. It was same as the FIG. 2. The error had been made during the last stages of submitting publication-quality figures. The reviewers had seen the correct figure. The correct figure and legend is reprinted below. FIG. 3. Plots of the contrast ratio of the Gd concentrations at