by Glick, Miller, and Cardinal ''Making a life in the field of organizational sciences''. Their major theme is that ours is a weak paradigm field in which there is no consensus about the methods and problems that should be addressed in our research and scholarship, compared to the natural sciences t
Making a life in the physical sciences
β Scribed by Brian Space
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 49 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.534
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
As a practicing physical chemist, I argue that the challenges faced by the physical sciences have more parallels with organization science than it might first appear. While the physical sciences do represent a strong paradigm endeavor, many of the same issues that were raised in the article βMaking a life in the field of organizational scienceβ arise in physical sciences. An essential difference between the physical sciences and organization science is the essentially capital intensive nature of our research. Ironically, the constant pursuit of the requisite research dollars leads to substantial similarity between the fields. The state of academic physical sciences is analyzed in this context informed by the current state of research funding in the United States. Copyright Β© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In a provocative address and article, Jeff Pfeffer called for greater consensus and stronger paradigm development in organization science. John Van Maanen and others responded with encouragement for the existing order where a thousand flowers can bloom. More than 10 years after this deb
## Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a βFull Textβ option. The original article is trackable v
## Abstract A stimulating article by Glick et al. has provoked a number of responses in this journal. We contribute our opinions to this interchange because we think that the situation is not nearly as bleak as Glick et al. and others would have us believe. In order to corroborate our contentions,