𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Making a life in the field of organization science

✍ Scribed by William H. Glick; C. Chet Miller; Laura B. Cardinal


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
157 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-3796

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In a provocative address and article, Jeff Pfeffer called for greater consensus and stronger paradigm development in organization science. John Van Maanen and others responded with encouragement for the existing order where a thousand flowers can bloom. More than 10 years after this debate, it appears that many flowers are still blooming. Lost in the original and current discourse, however, is the story of individuals struggling to make a life in a field characterized by weak paradigm development. In this essay, we tell their story, a story of wasted efforts and uncertain outcomes. The degree of dissensus and weak paradigm development in our field has significant implications for junior scholars. These implications will not be ameliorated by calling for stronger paradigm development. Wishing for consensus does not appear to have any impact on our field or on individual outcomes. Rather than despair over the plight of the field and the tremendous costs to individuals, we conclude with a simple proposal designed to aid aspiring scholars. Copyright Β© 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Making a life in the physical sciences
✍ Brian Space πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 49 KB

## Abstract As a practicing physical chemist, I argue that the challenges faced by the physical sciences have more parallels with organization science than it might first appear. While the physical sciences do represent a strong paradigm endeavor, many of the same issues that were raised in the art

Introduction: on making a life in the or
✍ Paul E. Spector πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 35 KB

by Glick, Miller, and Cardinal ''Making a life in the field of organizational sciences''. Their major theme is that ours is a weak paradigm field in which there is no consensus about the methods and problems that should be addressed in our research and scholarship, compared to the natural sciences t

Standing out in the fields of organizati
✍ Denise M. Rousseau πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 98 KB

No agreed-upon organizational science paradigm exists because there is still no single field of organizational science. True to its history, ours is an interdisciplinary domain focusing on behavior, in, around, and of organizations (cf. Perrow, 1973;Katz & Kahn, 1978). Organizational science is more

Viewing science in a different light: Ma
✍ William C. Kyle Jr. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 9 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

I believe you will find this issue of the Journal to be both intellectually stimulating and thought provoking. Each article focuses upon feminist scholarship, issues of gender, and/or gender equity. The authors challenge the historical, sociocultural, and political ideologies of science and the asso