## Abstract This study assessed the factor structure, internal consistency, and discriminatory validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) version used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD). In total 8796 adults were assessed us
Main traumatic events in Europe: PTSD in the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders survey
✍ Scribed by Jean-Michel Darves-Bornoz; Jordi Alonso; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Josep-Maria Haro; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Laurence Negre-Pages; Gemma Vilagut; Isabelle Gasquet
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 107 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-9867
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A potentially traumatic event (PTE) contributes to trauma through its frequency, conditional probability of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and experience of other PTEs. A cross‐sectional survey was conducted, enrolling 21,425 adults nationally representative of six European countries. Using the WHO‐Composite International Diagnostic Interview, 8,797 were interviewed on 28 PTEs and PTSD. Prevalence of 12‐month PTSD was 1.1%. When PTSD was present, the mean number of PTEs experienced was 3.2. In a multivariate analysis on PTEs and gender, six PTEs were found to be more traumatic, and to explain a large percentage of PTSD, as estimated by their attributable risk of PTSD: rape, undisclosed private event, having a child with serious illness, beaten by partner, stalked, beaten by caregiver.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Despite interest in the nature of the traumatic event required to meet Criterion A for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as defined in the __Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐IV__; American Psychiatric Association, 1994), little attention has been paid to the
## Aims To ensure that all Alzheimer centres across Europe are capable of using a similar method of data collection. Information about the patient assessment tools used by each participating centre was obtained and normal clinical practice in each EADC centre was documented by collecting data from