The continual reassessment method (CRM) enables full and e$cient use of all data and prior information available in a phase I study. However, despite a number of recent enhancements to the method, its acceptance in actual clinical practice has been hampered by several practical di$culties. In this p
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Longitudinal Design for Phase I Clinical Trials Using the Continual Reassessment Method
โ Scribed by Anna T.R Legedza; Joseph G Ibrahim
- Book ID
- 114186780
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 354 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0197-2456
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Adaptive design improvements in the cont
โ
Julie M. Heyd; Bradley P. Carlin
๐
Article
๐
1999
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 126 KB
๐ 2 views
39A Incorporating toxicity grade informa
โ
Carl A. de Moor; Susan G. Hilsenbeck; Gary M. Clark
๐
Article
๐
1995
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 116 KB
A trivariate continual reassessment meth
โ
Wei Zhong; Joseph S. Koopmeiners; Bradley P. Carlin
๐
Article
๐
2012
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 175 KB
The bivariate continual reassessment met
โ
Thomas M. Braun
๐
Article
๐
2002
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 148 KB
Using the continual reassessment method:
โ
Xavier Paoletti; Benoรฎt Baron; Patrick Schรถffski; Pierre Fumoleau; Denis Lacombe
๐
Article
๐
2006
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 185 KB
Continual reassessment methods in phase
โ
Andrew Kramar; Anne Lebecq; Emmanuel Candalh
๐
Article
๐
1999
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 153 KB
๐ 2 views
Most phase I trials in oncology use standard methods for treating successive groups of patients with increasing doses in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). These methods have been criticized because they treat many patients at suboptimal dose levels, and do not provide an accurate