Liver diffusivity in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic liver disease: Comparison of breathhold and free-breathing techniques

✍ Scribed by Mamak Eatesam; Susan M. Noworolski; Phyllis C. Tien; Michelle Nystrom; Jennifer L. Dodge; Raphael B. Merriman; Aliya Qayyum

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2011
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 784 KB
• Volume: 35
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1053-1807
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22748

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare liver ADC obtained with breathhold and free‐breathing diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in healthy volunteers and patients with liver disease.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty‐eight subjects, 12 healthy volunteers and 16 patients (9 NAFLD, 7 chronic active HCV), underwent breathhold (BH) and free‐breathing (FB) DWI MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine correlation while paired t‐tests assessed differences between BH and FB ADC. Estimated bias was calculated using the Bland‐Altman method.

Results:

Liver ADC (×10^−3^ mm^2^/s) was lower on BH for all groups (mean difference 0.36 ± 0.20; P < 0.01). ADC was higher in healthy volunteers (BH 1.80 ± 0.18; FB 2.24 ± 0.20) compared with NAFLD patients (BH 1.43 ± 0.27; FB 1.78 ± 0.28) (P < 0.001) and HCV patients (BH 1.63 ± 0.191; FB 1.88 ± 0.12). Overall correlation between BH and FB ADC was (r = 0.75), greatest in NAFLD (r = 0.90) compared with the correlation in HCV (r = 0.24) and healthy subjects (r = 0.34). Bland‐Altman plots did not show agreement in mean absolute difference and estimated bias between subjects.

Conclusion:

Correlation between BH and FB liver ADC is moderate indicating that BH and FB should not be used interchangeably. Additionally, the lower ADC values in BH versus FB should be accounted for when comparing different liver DWI studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:103‐109. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.