✦ LIBER ✦

Letter. Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling

✍ Scribed by B. Eiben; W. Hammans; W. Trawicki; R. Goebel

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 42 KB
Volume: 18
Category: Article
ISSN: 0197-3851
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199804)18:4<405::aid-pd258>3.0.co;2-c

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

EARLY FILTRATION AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FURTH

EARLY FILTRATION AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF MOSAICISM DIAGNOSED BY CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING

✍ K. SUNDBERG; C. LUNDSTEEN; J. PHILIP 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 679 KB

In 44 pregnancies where chorionic villus sampling (CVS) had shown mosaicism, early amniocentesis using a filter technique was camed out with the purpose of clarifying the fetal karyotype and reducing the waiting time for a final karyotype. Since the filter technique increases the cell yield of the a

Chorionic villus sampling followed by am

Chorionic villus sampling followed by amniocentesis in the same pregnancy

✍ Donnenfeld, Alan E. ;Librizzi, Ronald J. ;Dunn, Linda K. ;Craparo, Frank ;Godmil 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 390 KB

Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus s

Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and subsequent amniocentesis

✍ Brandenburg, H. ;Jahoda, M. G. J. ;Pijpers, L. ;Reuss, A. ;Kleyer, W. J. ;Wladim 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB

## Abstract Here we review a group of 82 patients who underwent both chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis in the same pregnancy during the period May 1984–May 1988. A fetal loss rate of 2.5% is documented. This is not essentially different from the sum of fetal loss rates following eac

Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampli

Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations? Experience with 500 cases

✍ Cardi van den Berg; Armando P. G. Braat; Diane Van Opstal; Dicky J. J. Halley; W 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 233 KB

500 women with multiple pregnancies underwent amniocentesis or chorionic villus (CV) sampling at our department between January 1988 and July 1997. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the laboratory aspects and the consequences of discordant results in these pregnancies in relation t

First-trimester transcervical chorionic

First-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling by biopsy forceps versus mid-trimester amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial project

✍ Antoni Borrell; Albert Fortuny; Ligia Lazaro; Dolors Costa; Agusti Seres; Sara P 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 166 KB

Up to now, no data are available comparing amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) using biopsy forceps. A series of 1313 consecutive women referred to our unit before 12 weeks of pregnancy for fetal cytogenetic analysis because of advanced maternal age, were randomized into CVS with the u

Comparison of cell cultures, chromosome

Comparison of cell cultures, chromosome quality and karyotypes obtained after chorionic villus sampling and early amniocentesis with filter technique

✍ K. Sundberg; C. Lundsteen; J. Philip 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

548 cell cultures and karyotypes obtained by early amniocentesis with filtration technique (EAF) at a mean gestational age of 12Y weeks were compared with 555 obtained by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at a mean gestational age of 11 weeks. The number of abnormal karyotypes, culture