The two-year pilot phase of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial concluded September 29, 1994. The goals, organization, operation, and recruitment status of the trial are discussed. The PLCO trial is a 16year randomized controlled screening trial involving 148,000 male and female
Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial
✍ Scribed by Harry J. de Koning; Anssi Auvinen; Antonio Berenguer Sanchez; Fernando Calais da Silva; Stefano Ciatto; Louis Denis; John K. Gohagan; Matti Hakama; Jonas Hugosson; Ries Kranse; Vera Nelen; Philip C. Prorok; Fritz H. Schröder; ERSPC; the PLCO Trials (the International Prostate Cancer Screening Trials Evaluation Group)
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 79 KB
- Volume
- 97
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
- DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.1588
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Two large‐scale randomized screening trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary (PLCO) cancer trial in the USA and the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial in Europe are currently under way, aimed at assessing whether screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. Up to the end of 1998, 102,691 men have been randomized to the intervention arm and 115,322 to the control arm (which represents 83% of the target sample size) from 7 European countries and 10 screening centers in the USA. The principal screening method at all centers is determination of serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA). The PLCO trial and some European centers use also digital rectal examination (DRE) as an ancillary screening test. In the core age group (55–69 years), 3,362 of 32,486 men screened (10%) had a serum PSA concentration of 4 ng/ml or greater, which is 1 cut‐off for biopsy (performed in 84%). An additional 6% was referred for further assessment based on other criteria, with much less efficiency. Differences in PSA by country are largely attributable to the age structure of the study population. The mean age‐specific PSA levels are lower in the PLCO trial (1.64 ng/ml [in the age group 55–59 years], 1.80 [60–64 years] and 2.18 [65–69 years) than in the ERSPC trial (1.28–1.71 [55–59], 1.75–2.87 [60–64] and 2.48–3.06 [65–69 years]). Detection rates at the first screen in the ERSPC trial range from 11 to 42/1,000 men screened and reflect underlying differences in incidence rates and screening procedures. In centers with consent to randomization design, adherence in the screening arm is 91%, but less than half of the men in the target population are enrolled in the trial. In population‐based centers in which men were randomized prior to consent, all eligible subjects are enrolled, but only about two‐thirds of the men in the intervention arm undergo screening. Considerable progress has been made in both trials. Enrollment will be completed in 2001. A substantial number of early prostate cancers have been detected. The differences between countries seem to reflect both underlying prostate cancer incidence and screening policy. The trials have the power to show definitive results in 2005–2008. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Decreased risk of advanced prostate cancer has been reported among men using statins. However, the evidence on overall prostate cancer risk is conflicting. We compared the relative risk between current users and non‐users of statins or other cholesterol‐lowering medications in a populat
## Abstract IGF‐1 and IGFBP‐3 may influence risk of prostate cancer through their roles in cellular growth, metabolism and apoptosis, however, epidemiologic results have been inconsistent. The role of obesity in prostate cancer risk is not clearly understood, but hyperinsulinemia‐related increases
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Acceptance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy has been poor, in part because of providers' concerns regarding the acceptability of the procedure. In the current prospective study, the authors used adherence to repeat testing to assess the acceptability of screening flexi
## Abstract From 1992–2001, 7 countries in Europe gradually recruited men for the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Centres recruit different age groups and have different designs for recruiting and countries have different underlying risks for prostate cancer. Recrui
## Background: A consensus meeting on screening and global strategy for prostate carcinoma, held in antwerp in 1994, determined the willingness among european cancer prevention centers to pursue vigorously the collaborative formation of a multinational randomized screening trial. this trial was to