In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, peopleβs material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonst
Justice, Equality and Constructivism: Essays on G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality (Ratio Special Issues)
β Scribed by Brian Feltham
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 137
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This collection critically engages with a number of recurrent themes from the work of G.A. Cohen, and most especially with arguments and positions advanced in his Rescuing Justice and Equality.A critical discussion of the work of the contemporary political theorist G.A. Cohen, an egalitarian and a critic of John RawlsOffers a critical perspective on his significant work on equality and constructivism, including his eagerly anticipated new book Rescuing Justice and EqualityThe contributors to this volume are noted for their own work on these topicsChallenges Cohenβs view of the centrality of equality to justice, of the scope for free choice of occupation and economic incentives, as well as his view that fundamental principles of justice are insensitive to facts
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, people's material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonst
In this work of political philosophy, Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society where distributive justice prevails, peopleβs material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonstrates that distributive justice does not to
<p>In this work of political philosophy, Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society where distributive justice prevails, peopleβs material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonstrates that distributive justice does not
<p>In this work of political philosophy, Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society where distributive justice prevails, peopleβs material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonstrates that distributive justice does not
<p> In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, peopleβs material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen dem