✦ LIBER ✦

“It's not what you expect”: teaching irony to third graders

✍ Scribed by Jon C. Stott

Book ID: 105089884
Publisher: Springer
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 642 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 0045-6713
DOI: 10.1007/bf01142594

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: I

Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What They Hear

✍ Albert W. Wu; I-Chan Huang; Samantha Stokes; Peter J. Pronovost 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB

It's Not What You're Eating, It's What's Eating You: A Teenager's Guide to Preventing Eating Disorders—and Loving Yourself

✍ Shari Brady 📂 Fiction 📅 2018 🏛 Skyhorse Publishing 🌐 English ⚖ 619 KB

**A guide for young people to achieving a healthy relationship with food and their bodies in the face of today's social pressures and emotional challenges.** Part accessible self-help guide and part constructive hands-on workbook, *It's Not What You're Eating, It's What's Eating You* teaches young

Possible selves and career transition: I

Possible selves and career transition: It's who you want to be, not what you want to do

✍ Geoff Plimmer; Alison Schmidt 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 92 KB

It’s not just what you know, it’s who yo

It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: Testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance

✍ Tracey E. Rizzuto; Jared LeDoux; John Paul Hatala 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB

It's not just what you do, it's the way

It's not just what you do, it's the way that you do it: the effect of different payment card formats and survey administration on willingness to pay for health gain

✍ Richard D. Smith 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract A general population sample of 314 Australian respondents were randomly allocated to complete a contingent valuation survey administered by face‐to‐face or telephone (‘phone‐mail‐phone’) interview. Although the telephone interview was quicker to complete, no significant difference was f