✦ LIBER ✦

Is Mereology Ontologically Innocent?

✍ Scribed by Byeong-Uk Yi

Book ID: 111533353
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 75 KB
Volume: 93
Category: Article
ISSN: 0031-8116
DOI: 10.1023/a:1004274912342

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

How innocent is mereology?

✍ Peter Forrest 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 285 KB

Bimodality of formal ontology and mereol

Bimodality of formal ontology and mereology

✍ Roberto Poli 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 391 KB

From the distinctions between "ontology" and "logic" and between "formal" and "material" we obtain two basic oppositions. Keeping the term "ontology" constant yields the opposition between "formal ontology" and "material ontology". This raises a question: when one speaks of ontology, how can its for

Sheaf mereology and Husserl's morphologi

Sheaf mereology and Husserl's morphological ontology

✍ Jean Petitot 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 825 KB

This paper begins with Husserl's phenomenological distinction between formal ontology (analytic theory of general objects) and "material" regional ontologies (types of "essences" of objects which prescribe "synthetic a priori" rules). It then shows that, as far as its "ontological design" is concern

What is Classical Mereology?

✍ Paul Hovda 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 490 KB

What is Nominalistic Mereology?

✍ Jeremy Meyers 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 614 KB

Creating “denial” typologies is ontologi

Creating “denial” typologies is ontologically questionable

✍ Salander, Pär 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB