๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Sheaf mereology and Husserl's morphological ontology

โœ Scribed by Jean Petitot


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
825 KB
Volume
43
Category
Article
ISSN
1071-5819

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper begins with Husserl's phenomenological distinction between formal ontology (analytic theory of general objects) and "material" regional ontologies (types of "essences" of objects which prescribe "synthetic a priori" rules). It then shows that, as far as its "ontological design" is concerned, transcendental phenomenology can be seen as an "object-oriented" epistemology (opposed to the classical "procedurab" epistemology). The paper also analyses the morphological example, which constitutes the core of HusserI's third Logical Investigation, of the unilateral relation of foundation between sense qualities and spatio-temporal extension. It gives a geometrical model using the geometrical concepts of fibration, sheaf and topos.

(C) 1995 Academic Press Limited


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bimodality of formal ontology and mereol
โœ Roberto Poli ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1995 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 391 KB

From the distinctions between "ontology" and "logic" and between "formal" and "material" we obtain two basic oppositions. Keeping the term "ontology" constant yields the opposition between "formal ontology" and "material ontology". This raises a question: when one speaks of ontology, how can its for