## Abstract Eight patients with advanced PD received a unilateral STN DBS. The UPDRS III __off__ drug–on DBS was improved by a mean 44%. Dyskinesias were ameliorated. Levodopa daily dose was reduced. Three patients required the implantation of the second electrode__.__ Unilateral DBS may be efficac
Ipsilateral sequential arm movements after unilateral subthalamic deep-brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease
✍ Scribed by Rocco Agostino; Loredana Dinapoli; Nicola Modugno; Ennio Iezzi; Bruno Gregori; Vincenzo Esposito; Pantaleo Romanelli; Alfredo Berardelli
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 119 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Unilateral STN‐DBS significantly improves the performance of contralateral sequential arm movements. Whether unilateral STN‐DBS also improves ipsilateral sequential movement is unclear. In this study in unmedicated parkinsonian patients, we tested the effect of unilateral STN‐DBS on the performance of ipsilateral sequential movements and compared it with the performance of contralateral sequential movements. Three‐dimensional movements were recorded with the ELITE system and three kinematic variables were considered: total movement time (TMT), total inter‐onset latency (IOL), and spatial accuracy. Unilateral STN‐DBS significantly decreased TMT in the contralateral arm and only tended to do so also in the ipsilateral arm, whereas it significantly decreased IOL and worsened spatial accuracy only on the contralateral side. Before unilateral STN‐DBS a positive correlation was present between the clinical impairment and the TMTs in the contralateral and ipsilateral sides. After unilateral STN‐DBS the UPDRS scores improved in the contralateral and to a lesser extent also in the ipsilateral side. Correlation analysis between clinical and kinematic data showed no differences between the contralateral and ipsilateral sides. Our kinematic findings show that after STN‐DBS parkinsonian patients' performance of a sequential motor task improves significantly on the contralateral but only tended to do so on the ipsilateral side. Ipsilateral changes can be explained by the observation that the output structures of the basal ganglia send large ipsilateral and less dense contralateral projections to the thalamus. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Weight, body mass index (BMI) and energy expenditure/energy intake (EE/EI) was studied in 19 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) versus 14 nonoperated ones. Operated patients had a significant weight gain (WG, + 9.7 +/- 7 kg) and BMI increase (+ 4.7 k
## Abstract This study examined whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) would affect the contrast sensitivity (CS) curve in patients with PD. CS was tested in 12 nondemented PD patients treated with bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS on and off stimulation and medications. Neither stimulation condition
## Abstract We investigated gender‐differences in clinical phenomenology and response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in a group of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Thirty‐eight consecutive patients with PD (22 men and 16 women), bilaterally implante
## Abstract ## Background: In Parkinson's disease, sleep disturbance is a common occurrence. ## Methods: We evaluated sleep in 10 patients with Parkinson's disease (age, 57.5 ± 9.8 years; disease duration, 12.3 ± 2.7 years) before and after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation using the Pa
## Abstract To determine whether the degree to which a patient with Parkinson's disease expects therapeutic benefit from subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation (STN‐DBS) influences the magnitude of his or her improved motor response, 10 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's and bilateral STN‐DBS