๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Intraepithelial neoplasia, surrogate endpoint biomarkers, and cancer chemoprevention

โœ Scribed by Dr. Charles W. Boone; Gary J. Kelloff


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
930 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Neoplasia is a progression of molecular, cellular, and tissue changes starting with a critical cell mutation and advancing by clonal evolution, involving further multiple mutations and expanding mutated clones. This process is characterized by five general stages: latency, focal growth of normal-appearing but disorganized cells, abnormal-appearing cells (dysplasia), microinvasion, and finally, metastasis. The two driving forces of neoplastic progression in an epithelium are mutagenesis and mitogenesis. These forces frequently occur concurrently, produced by exposure of the epithelium to environmental and endogenous mutagens and mitogens. The major strategy of chemoprevention is to block the effects of both mutagens and mitogens during the early stages of predysplasia and dysplasia.

Surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) are tissue, cellular, and molecular changes that correlate with the later development of cancer. Because of the savings in cost, labor, and time, SEBs are urgently needed to replace the use of cancer incidence reduction as the endpoint for chemopreventive agent clinical trials. The advent of computer-assisted cytometry allows each of the seven basic criteria of dysplasia to be individually assayed as an SEB. Since the dysplastic changes that characterize intraepithelial neoplasia are embodied in the causal pathway to invasive neoplasia, they are already validated as predictors of cancer incidence. More attention should be paid to the quality control of SEB assays, including control of variation in cell composition of tissue samples, assay protocol, instrumentation used, and observer performance. The dose-response relationship between a known chemopreventive agent and the SEB should also be evaluated.

The Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, has begun a program to test chemopreventive agents in short-term Phase I1 clinical trials using dysplasiabased SEBs. The SEBs are assayed, when possible, by computerized cytometry. Trials are being conducted for oral leukoplakia, cutaneous actinic keratosis, superficial bladder cancer, pulmonary metaplasia/dysplasia, cervical dysplasia (CIN 111), and adenomatous colonic polyps.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cervical cancer chemoprevention, vaccine
โœ Michele Follen; Frank L. Meyskens Jr.; Ronald D. Alvarez; Joan L. Walker; Maria ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 883 KB

At the Second International Conference on Cervical Cancer, held April 11-14, 2002, experts in cervical cancer prevention, detection, and treatment reviewed the need for more research in chemoprevention, including prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines, immunomodulators, peptides, and surrogate endpoi

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN
โœ David G. Bostwick; Joseph W. Aquilina ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 876 KB

The most efficient strategy for chemoprevention clinical trials are short-term studies which focus on surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) in high-risk target populations. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostate cancer, and is found in a signific

Genetic surrogate endpoint biomarkers in
โœ D. Craig Allred ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 105 KB

## Genetic Surrogate Endpoint Biomarkers in Early Breast Neoplasia "Biomarkers in Early Breast Neoplasia," presented by D. Craig Allred. The biological mechanisms of breast cancer evolution are poorly understood. Furthermore, this problem has been difficult to study because potential precursor les

Genetic surrogate endpoint biomarkers in
โœ Leslie Brand ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 62 KB

Carolina) discussed the relationship of oncogenes and breast cancer. Specifically, he described much of the recent work with HER-2/neu, PRADI, and p53. Some of these genetic lesions appear early in the breast cancer process and are stable as the tumors become invasive and metastasize. Dr. Liu also p

A phase II chemoprevention trial design
โœ Kapil Dhingra ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1995 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 434 KB

Surrogate biomarkers for risk assessment and efficacy of potential chemopreventive agents are needed to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of conducting chemoprevention trials. In addition to criteria of sensitivity, specificity, quantifiability, and reproducibility applicable to most potent