𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study

✍ Scribed by D. Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers


Publisher
Routledge
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Leaves
582
Series
Applied Legal Philosophy
Edition
New edition
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This book is a work of outstanding importance for scholars of comparative law and jurisprudence and for lawyers engaged in EC law or other international forms of practice. It reviews, compares and analyses the practice of interpretation in nine countries representing Europe as well as the US and Argentina in common and civil law; it also explores implications for general theories of interpretation and of justification. Its authors, who include Aulis Aarnio, Robert Alexy, Ralf Dreier, Enrique Zuleta-Puceiro, Michel Troper, Christophe Grzegorczyk, Jean-Louis Gardes, Enrico Pattaro, Michele Taruffo, Massimo La Torre, Jerry Wroblewski, Alexsander Peczenik, Gunnar Bergholtz and Zenon Bankowski, as well as editors Robert S. Summers and D. Neil MacCormick, constitute an international team of great distinction; they have worked on this project for over seven years.

✦ Subjects


Reference;Law Practice;Law;Jurisprudence;Legal Theory & Systems;Law;Philosophy;Law;Legal Reference;Law;New, Used & Rental Textbooks;Specialty Boutique


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Interpreting precedents: a comparative s
✍ MacCormick, Neil;Summers, Robert S πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2016 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

1. Introduction / D. Neil MacCormick, Edinburgh and Robert S. Summers, Ithaca -- 2. Precedent in the Federal Republic of Germany / Robert Alexy, Kiel and Ralf Dreier, GΓΆttingen -- 3. Precedent in Finland / Aulis Aarnio, Tampere -- 4. Precedent in France / Michel Troper, Paris and Christophe Grzegorc

Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparativ
✍ Jeffrey Goldsworthy (ed.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods. Each of the six federations is the subject o

Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative S
✍ D. Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers, Arthur L. Goodhart πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

This book contains a series of essays discussing the uses of precedent as a source of law and a basis for legal arguments in nine different legal systems, representing a variety of legal traditions. Precedent is fundamental to law, yet theoretical and ideological as well as legal considerations lea

Comparative Federalism: A Study in Judic
✍ Victor S. Mackinnon M.A., LLB. (Glasgow,) LL M., S.J.D. (Harvard) (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1964 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>Modem societies, - like organized societies of all eras, - suffer from antithetical aspirations, from competing institutionalizations of that which is desirable, and that which, though unwelcome, is inevitable. Men clearly see the advantages of localism, of the self determination of small peoples