Interpreting constitutions : a comparative study

Publisher: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Category: Library

⬇ Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Digitized at Georgetown University Law Library

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparativ

📁 Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study

✍ Jeffrey Goldsworthy (ed.) 📂 Library 📅 2006 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English

This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods. Each of the six federations is the subject o

Interpreting precedents: a comparative s

📁 Interpreting precedents: a comparative study

✍ MacCormick, Neil;Summers, Robert S 📂 Library 📅 2016 🏛 Routledge 🌐 English

1. Introduction / D. Neil MacCormick, Edinburgh and Robert S. Summers, Ithaca -- 2. Precedent in the Federal Republic of Germany / Robert Alexy, Kiel and Ralf Dreier, Göttingen -- 3. Precedent in Finland / Aulis Aarnio, Tampere -- 4. Precedent in France / Michel Troper, Paris and Christophe Grzegorc

Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Stu

📁 Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study

✍ D. Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers 📂 Library 📅 1991 🏛 Routledge 🌐 English

This book is a work of outstanding importance for scholars of comparative law and jurisprudence and for lawyers engaged in EC law or other international forms of practice. It reviews, compares and analyses the practice of interpretation in nine countries representing Europe as well as the US and Ar

Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative S

📁 Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study

✍ D. Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers, Arthur L. Goodhart 📂 Library 📅 1997 🏛 Routledge 🌐 English

This book contains a series of essays discussing the uses of precedent as a source of law and a basis for legal arguments in nine different legal systems, representing a variety of legal traditions. Precedent is fundamental to law, yet theoretical and ideological as well as legal considerations lea

Comparative Federalism: A Study in Judic

📁 Comparative Federalism: A Study in Judicial Interpretation

✍ Victor S. Mackinnon M.A., LLB. (Glasgow,) LL M., S.J.D. (Harvard) (auth.) 📂 Library 📅 1964 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>Modem societies, - like organized societies of all eras, - suffer from antithetical aspirations, from competing institutionalizations of that which is desirable, and that which, though unwelcome, is inevitable. Men clearly see the advantages of localism, of the self determination of small peoples

How Constitutions Change: A Comparative

📁 How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study

✍ Dawn Oliver; Carlo Fusaro (editors) 📂 Library 📅 2011 🏛 Hart Publishing 🌐 English

This set of essays explores how constitutions change and are changed in a number of countries, and how the ‘constitution’ of the EU changes and is changed. For a range of reasons, including internal and external pressures, the constitutional arrangements in many countries are changing. Constitutiona