clinician version (IDS-C), was developed by Rush et al. to evaluate the severity of major depressive episodes. The aim of the present study was to establish the inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the IDS-C. A total of 16 subjects with DSM-IV major depressive episode were evaluated. T
Inter--rater and test--retest reliability of the Japanese version of the subjective deficit syndrome scale
β Scribed by M. Kokai; T. Inada; K. Ohara; M. Shimizu; H. Iwado; Y. Morita
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 50 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
- DOI
- 10.1002/hup.439
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The subjective deficit syndrome scale (SDSS) was established in 1990 by Jaeger et al. to assess systematically subjective experiences of schizophrenic patients. It was translated into Japanese in 1999 by this paper's second author (T.I.). In this study, the interβrater reliability of this Japanese version (SDSSβJ) was examined. The subjects studied were 13 schizophrenic patients (male 6, female 7; respective average ages at study entry and disease onset: 41 and 25 years), who were being followed up at the outpatients' service of the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Hyogo College of Medicine. Four psychiatrists attended together, the systematic interview with each subject to rate the SDSSβJ and independently rated 19 items. The severity scales of the items assessed by these raters ranged from 0 to 4 for 12 items and from 0 to 3 for 7. The ANOVA ICC interβrater reliability values for the 19 individual items ranged from 0.67 to 0.96. The ANOVA ICC testβretest reliability values achieved by two raters were also high overall, ranging from 0.72 to 1.00, except for one item (item 13) assessed by one rater. Our results suggest that the SDSSβJ is a potentially useful rating scale for evaluating subjective experiences of schizophrenic subjects. Copyright Β© 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The interβrater reliability of the Japanese version of MADRS (MADRSJ) was examined using the structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA) developed by our group. Two or more psychiatrists attended the systematic interview sessions with each subject to evaluate MADRSJ independently, usin
We assessed the inter-rater reliability of the 100-point International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Three neurologists independently rated videotaped ICARS examinations of 22 subjects with genetically determined ataxias (spinocerebellar ataxia [SCA] Type 1 in 11; SCA Type 2 in 1; Friedre