## Abstract Clinicians require scientifically rigorous, clinically meaningful rating scales to evaluate the health impact of disease and treatment that cannot be measured using conventional laboratory instruments. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the International Cooperative Ata
Inter-rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS)
β Scribed by Elsdon Storey; Kate Tuck; Robert Hester; Andrew Hughes; Andrew Churchyard
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 233 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We assessed the inter-rater reliability of the 100-point International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Three neurologists independently rated videotaped ICARS examinations of 22 subjects with genetically determined ataxias (spinocerebellar ataxia [SCA] Type 1 in 11; SCA Type 2 in 1; Friedreich's ataxia in 10) and 4 controls. Scores on live ICARS assessment had ranged from 0 to 7 for controls and 11 to 74 for ataxic subjects (clinically very mildly affected to wheelchair-bound). Inter-rater correlation was very high for the total score (Kendall's omega 0.994, 95% confidence interval, 0.988-0.997), and high to very high for each component subscore (0.791 for speech to 0.994 for posture/gait). All correlations were significant at P < 0.00001. The ICARS exhibits very high inter-rater reliability even without prior observer standardisation and is sensitive to a range of ataxia severities from very mild to severe.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
To evaluate the efficacy of treatments in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), appropriate clinical scales are required. This study evaluated metric properties of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in 156 SCA patients and 8 controls. ICARS was found to be a reliable scale satisfyin
We assessed the International Cooperative Ataxia Scale (ICARS) as a means of extracting and rating cerebellar signs in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Cross-sectional analysis of internal consistency, factor structure, and correlation with parkinsonism severity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Sca
## Abstract Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the international cooperative ataxia rating scale (ICARS) and the unified multiple system atrophy rating scale (UMSARS) in patients with MachadoβJoseph disease (MJD). We assessed 52 consecutive subjects with MJD using each scale. Both scales had a
Background Psychopathological rating scales are developed and tested on a relatively young population. Their applicability and psychometric performance in the elderly (aged above 60-65 years) are mostly unknown. It is unknown how factors related to ageing or mild cognitive dysfunction influence the
## Abstract To develop a brief ataxia rating scale (BARS) for use by movement disorder specialists and general neurologists. Current ataxia rating scales are cumbersome and not designed for clinical practice. We first modified the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) by adding seve