Intensional Semantics of System T of Gödel
✍ Scribed by Pierre Valarcher
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 806 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1571-0661
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is argued that Penrose's use of G6del's theorem to show that no machine can reproduce the achievements of a human mathematician depends on extra assumptions that would also show that no machine could ever check the validity of mathematical proofs: and it is claimed that the latter result contradi
Sloman's view largely reverses the usual view of Giidel's sentence. But Sloman does not have good arguments for his basic theses: that the Godel sentence does not mean what it is commonly taken to mean, and that we can't say that it is true in the intended model. The reason for Sloman's reversal of