Instability of collective decisions? Testing for cyclical majorities
โ Scribed by Thomas Stratmann
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 747 KB
- Volume
- 88
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0048-5829
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The issues of cyclical majorities and instability of collective choices have been in the forefront in the discussion of social choice mechanisms. Cycling, lack of equilibria, and so called chaos theorems have been prevalent in the public choice literature. Whether cycling actually occurs in processes that are decided by majority rule has been a long-standing question. However, cycling has not been made quantifiable nor has it been clear how one would determine empirically whether majorities are cyclical. In this paper, cycling has been given an empirical meaning. This paper provides a method to test for cyclical majorities and applies it to decisions made in the US Congress. The test results indicate stability and the presence of persistent winners and losers in Congress.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A computer model "MISTRAL" was adopted for evaluating management options. The study showed that the model can be used as a decision support tool for prioritizing management options. The model suggests that under current physical conditions of this distributary the combination of rotation between the
Recently it has been proved in a number of studies, that, under a proper set of assumptions, the optimal group decision rule in pairwise choice situations is a weighted majority rule, with weights that are proportional to the logarithms of the decision makers' odds of choosing the correct alternativ