๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Instability of collective decisions? Testing for cyclical majorities

โœ Scribed by Thomas Stratmann


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
747 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0048-5829

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The issues of cyclical majorities and instability of collective choices have been in the forefront in the discussion of social choice mechanisms. Cycling, lack of equilibria, and so called chaos theorems have been prevalent in the public choice literature. Whether cycling actually occurs in processes that are decided by majority rule has been a long-standing question. However, cycling has not been made quantifiable nor has it been clear how one would determine empirically whether majorities are cyclical. In this paper, cycling has been given an empirical meaning. This paper provides a method to test for cyclical majorities and applies it to decisions made in the US Congress. The test results indicate stability and the presence of persistent winners and losers in Congress.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Application of a hydraulic model for tes
โœ M. N. Bhutta; J. W. Kijne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 558 KB

A computer model "MISTRAL" was adopted for evaluating management options. The study showed that the model can be used as a decision support tool for prioritizing management options. The model suggests that under current physical conditions of this distributary the combination of rotation between the

Conditions for the optimality of simple
โœ Mark Gradstein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 237 KB

Recently it has been proved in a number of studies, that, under a proper set of assumptions, the optimal group decision rule in pairwise choice situations is a weighted majority rule, with weights that are proportional to the logarithms of the decision makers' odds of choosing the correct alternativ