After publication, it was realized that the ICR values for the 28-strand PR samples should be reduced by half in Table 4, Figs. 5 and6. This stems from the fact that the KEK cycle is half of a 1 T triangle wave cycle. There are three number replacements in the text as follows: p 205, col 1, line 16,
Influence of strand surface condition on interstrand contact resistance and coupling loss in NbTi-wound Rutherford cables
✍ Scribed by M.D Sumption; E.W Collings; R.M Scanlan; A Nijhuis; H.H.J ten Kate; S.W Kim; M Wake; T Shintomi
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 277 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0011-2275
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Presented in this work are the results of directly measured and AC-loss-derived interstrand contact resistance (ICR) measurements performed magnetically or resistively on bare-Cu and coated-strand pairs, calorimetrically on 11-strand Rutherford cables wound with strands that had been coated with various metallic and insulating layers, and calorimetrically and magnetically on 28-strand Rutherford cables (LHC-type) wound with bare-Cu-, Ni-, and stabrite-plated strands. Comparisons are made of the effects of various conditions of heat treatment, HT (time and temperature), and pressure (applied during HT and then either maintained or re-applied during measurement). The resulting ICRs are compared and interpreted in terms of the oxide layer on the strand coating and its response to curing conditions.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES