Corrigendum to “Influence of strand surface condition on interstrand contact resistance and coupling loss in NbTi-wound Rutherford cables” [Journal of Cryogenics, 39 (1999) 197–208]

✍ Scribed by M.D. Sumption; E.W. Collings; R.M. Scanlan; A. Nijhuis; H.H.J. ten Kate; S.W. Kim; M. Wake; T. Shintomi

• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• Year: 1999
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 78 KB
• Volume: 39
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0011-2275
• DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2275(99)00057-0

✦ Synopsis

After publication, it was realized that the ICR values for the 28-strand PR samples should be reduced by half in Table 4, Figs. 5 and6. This stems from the fact that the KEK cycle is half of a 1 T triangle wave cycle. There are three number replacements in the text as follows: p 205, col 1, line 16, the number 711 should read 356. p 205, col 2, line 3, the number 306 should now read 153. The amended Figs. 5 and 6 and Table 4 are shown below:

Cryogenics 39 (1999) 967±968

q PII of original article S0011-2275(99)00021-1.